Question:
I need some information about polar bears being endangered for a school project. any help?
2008-02-21 06:31:20 UTC
i ned help on why they are endangered and other information such as how we can save them , when they may be fully extinct, some other cool information, ect. This is a power point presentation with 7-10 slides so i need alot of good info. Thanks ppl. :-)
Eight answers:
whatserbut
2008-02-21 06:37:29 UTC
http://www.climatecrisis.net/

There are onther links, here as well.
2008-02-22 14:53:51 UTC
Polar bear are not endangered. Here is something the news media wont tell you. During the last warm-up, the Earth actually got warmer than it has gotten so far. The northern ice cap disappeared. Well there were polar bear then and they survived.



Classified as Vulnerable (VU) on the IUCN Red List 2007 (1).

http://www.arkive.org/species/GES/mammals/Ursus_maritimus/more_info.html



"Status: An estimated 21,000 to 28,000 polar bears roam across large distances of the Arctic. While not considered endangered, some isolated populations are vulnerable to pollution, and possibly to the effects of global warming."

http://nationalzoo.si.edu/Publications/ZooGoer/1999/2/fact-polar.cfm
jazzfan
2008-02-23 20:44:01 UTC
Polar bears survived the last interglacial period when temps were higher by far than they are now. Animals can adapt and fur-bearing animals can grow thinner coats, reduce fat under the skin and so forth. There is a stable population of polar bears and they are not endangered.



Since you need this for school you may find it more practical to play along as if they are endangered. You can find arguments for that position but they don't stand up to close scrutiny.
2008-02-21 10:45:08 UTC
Here's an excellent source.



http://www.defenders.org/take_action/ and article:



Tell President Bush to Protect Polar Bears





Scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey have said that habitat loss and global warming could cause polar bears to disappear entirely from Alaska by 2050. But that hasn't stopped the Bush/Cheney Administration from dragging its feet on protecting our polar bears under the Endangered Species Act or paving the way for harmful oil and gas drilling in sensitive polar bear habitat.



http://www.savearcticrefuge.org/
2016-10-20 06:51:36 UTC
there's no thank you to help the polar bears. And in case you think of that struggling with worldwide warming just to help out the polar bears is a solid theory, it incredibly is not. First, the polar undergo inhabitants is doing high quality as they have bigger in inhabitants 5-fold. they have been around for thousands and thousands of years, by using warmer and less warm situations. they're bears, and prefer different bears, they could consume almost something, which consists of human beings. they could hunt on land, on ice and interior the water. on a similar time as Antarticice presented that 5 communities are on the decline, the reason could or is probably no longer the quantity of ice (word that 2 are increasing and seven are unknown, no longer precisely solid info to reason substantial venture in basic terms yet). Upon increasing dramatically in inhabitants, each and every species hits a factor at which they outeat their nutrition furnish. that's around this inhabitants that the species will stabilize. What we actually don't understand is what may well be the stabilized inhabitants for the polar bears, if the climate have been held consistent. with out understanding this, we will not understand if the minor decreases we've considered are brought about via AGW or via the conventional cyclical development of inhabitants growth and decline in predators and prey. So the crap that Antice and the numerous "scientists" he references are shoveling isn't something extra desirable than wild guesses. Now the expenditures of manpower, lives lost, and funds for fixing AGW, is plenty extra desirable than the fee of saving the 25000 polar bears. on a similar time as I do agree that we could desire to lessen CO2 emission by ability of a nuclear answer, polar bears shouldn't ingredient into the equation because of the fact a million.) we don't understand sufficient to assert what the reason being two.) their 25000 lives are not extra substantial than thousands and thousands of individual's lives. As for decreasing CO2, an common plan of shifting in the direction of nuclear potential in alternative for previous coal potential flora mixed with e-automobiles might scale back our CO2 output to easily approximately 0. If we've been to apply one layout for diverse potential flora, the fee of potential might even shrink. it may well be a win for the earth, a win for our pocketbooks or maybe a win for those polar bears. Antarticice, thank you then for contributing yet another stupid answer that did no longer even address the question.
2008-02-21 06:41:39 UTC
The polar bears are not declining. They are not endangered.



The following link will help sort out the truth. It has several references to get you started on your research.



Good luck!
signman_03743
2008-02-21 06:36:17 UTC
Instead of trying to do your homework here by having everyone else do your legwork-you'd learn a lot more by going to the library (ever hear of one?) or at least using

Yahoo SEARCH and type in polar bears...then go through all the sites that come up. What do you think someone here is going to do-have it all memorized and write it for you?

The purpose of school projects and homework is for YOU to learn by doing the research-and typing in a question here is NOT research!
Dustykm
2008-02-21 07:11:36 UTC
Matt ~

I would suggest you check out mydaymadeeasy.com

Check the wildlife category in environment.

There are several excellent resources.

Be sure to look at Defenders of Wildlife listed in mydaymadeeasy.com


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...